WillsLegal Corner: Can a will be witnessed via a video call?

UPDATE: since the publication of this article, the law has been changed to allow witnessing wills remotely via videolink. Please see this article for further information:


At WillPack we get a large number of technical queries from our partners. This means the team is often looking into very varied and interesting areas of law. In this feature of the newsletter we will focus on some our more unique queries and pass that knowledge on to you!

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 and the recommendation of social distancing, we have had a number of queries regarding whether a will could be witnessed via a video call, such as Skype or Facetime. This week we will consider whether this is possible.

The Law

S9 Wills Act 1837 deals with how a will is validly signed and attested. It states the following:

No will shall be valid unless—

  1. it is in writing, and signed by the testator, or by some other person in his presence and by his direction; and
  2. it appears that the testator intended by his signature to give effect to the will; and
  3. the signature is made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time; and
  4. each witness either—
    1. attests and signs the will; or
    2. acknowledges his signature, in the presence of the testator (but not necessarily in the presence of any other witness),

but no form of attestation shall be necessary.

The main question arising from here when considering remote witnessing via a video link is the meaning of ‘in the presence of the testator’.

What does presence mean?

S9 does not specifically state whether physical presence is required. The Law Commission looked at this issue in a consultation in 2017 and confirmed that:

For a will to be valid, the testator must sign or acknowledge his or her signature in the presence of both witnesses and the witnesses must sign or acknowledge their signatures in the presence of the testator. Whether the parties are in each other’s presence is currently decided with reference to whether they are in the same room and whether there is a line of sight. That rule would be difficult to apply where a witness is said to have had a line of sight to the testator via an online videoconference (there has been no such case). However, it is unlikely that the current law governing witnessing extends to witnessing via videoconferencing because “presence” has been held to involve physical presence.

The current law therefore is that physical presence of the witnesses is required and witnessing via a video link is unlikely to be valid. We would therefore highly recommend against witnessing via video link unless the law is clarified in the near future.

Other options

Will writers are now in a difficult position where they will need to advise the testator to have two independent witnesses to sign their will but this would be against the government’s own advice to avoid physical contact as much as possible. You may wish to send the will to the testator for them to organise their witnesses and sign themselves. We have separate guidance on this to be found here.

A potential further option could be to rely on a previous, but old, case of Casson v Dade from 1781. In that case, the will was signed in the presence of the witnesses, but the testator felt faint and went out to sit in her carriage outside of her attorney’s offices. She then saw her witnesses sign her will through the window of the office. A will signed by the testator, witnessed by two witnesses through a window, who then themselves sign the will, with the testator watching through the window, would satisfy the requirements of S9. Much care would need to be taken with this approach to ensure that the will is still validly signed and to ensure that the virus is not potentially transferred from person to person via the handling of the will.

If you have any questions on this, please do not hesitate to contact us on [email protected].

Chris Rattigan-Smith


  • Iain Mackay

    27 March 2020 at 2:46 pm

    Where a Will is witnessed by the witnesses observing the execution of the Will through the kitchen window, per Casson v Dade , should the wording of the attestation be amended to indicate this? If so, how?

    And I should imagine that it is equally important that the testator is able to see the Witnesses sign, as they will, no doubt, be doing that after the Will has been passed to them.

    • Chris Smith

      31 March 2020 at 2:27 pm

      Hi Iain

      The attestation clause would not need to be amended, as witnessing through the window would be treated as being in the testator’s presence.

      It is equally important that the testator sees the witnesses sign the will through the window or if the testator does not see them sign that the witnesses acknowledge their signature through the window to the testator.

  • Graham Barney

    23 April 2020 at 3:18 pm


    What would the situation be if the testator was ill in bed making final arrangements just in case.

    They would be presumably unable to get out of bed let alone getting near a window. Secondly, does the law seriously expect any one to enter a covid infected home for the sake of adding a signature. Cant we treat everyone as being on the front line in a war and their wishes are accepted as is whilst this issue plays its self out.

    • Chris Smith

      23 April 2020 at 3:29 pm

      Hi Graham

      Unfortunately the situation would still be the same even if the testator was ill and bed bound.

      The current signing requirements will still need to be satisfied even if the testator has Covid 19. We do understand that the Law Society and Ministry of Justice have been in discussions for the past couple of weeks about changing the law in this area in light of Covid 19 but nothing has changed yet.

Comments are closed.